Over the past 20+ years working with clients, one of the biggest factors I’ve seen in people being able to meet both their short-term and long-term financial goals is the ability to create and sustain a positive cash flow margin.
That sounds pretty straightforward and even “easy” on paper, right? Debt.com reported last year that 93% of their respondents agreed that everyone needs a budget, but only 33% actually maintained a budget. So, why such a big gap? Why aren’t more people budgeting if they think they need it? One of the biggest explanations for the gap is that BUDGETING IS HARD!
“Many of life’s failures are people who did not realize how close they were to success when they gave up.”
Thomas Edison
Some of you reading this may be successful budgeters (gold star for you!), but the reality is that most people reading this have probably tried to put a budget together and have just fallen short in its completion. Is there a way to budget that actually works?
I’ve tried numerous systems and tools through the years and the one I keep coming back to is an approach called “zero-based budgeting”. Let’s dig a little deeper…
In a nutshell, zero-based budgeting means taking your income for the month (or whatever time period you’re budgeting for) and subtracting out your expenses (including amounts to pay down debt or put into savings) until it equals zero. Don’t let the “zero” fool you…It does NOT mean operating your bank account at zero!
Zero-based budgeting means taking every dollar received for the month and assigning it a specific job or role (i.e. groceries, family vacation, etc.). It’s a forward-looking budgeting process as opposed to a backward-looking one (more on that later). It helps prevent overspending before it happens and works with what you currently have (money in the bank) versus what you might receive in the future.
I know this is a simplified example, but hopefully, you get the point. You only work with dollars you HAVE and you give EVERY dollar a job to reduce overspending and waste. In this example, I’m showing you a monthly budget. When the new month begins, the process starts all over again.
If this pattern repeated itself over the course of 12 months, they would have money in their bank account earmarked for:
This method of budgeting has many advantages in my opinion, but let’s look at how it compares to traditional budgeting:
Zero-Based BudgetingTraditional BudgetingForward-lookingBackward-lookingProactiveReactive“What do I have available to spend?”“How much did I already spend?”Prevents overspendingIdentifies overspendingCan adjust during the month“Try to do better” next monthBudget the money you currently haveBudget the money you think you’ll haveEasy to handle “irregular” expenses (car maintenance, taxes, etc.)More difficult to account for “irregular” expenses
There are many other comparisons that could be made, but the biggest in my opinion is just the proactive style versus reactive style of traditional budgeting. Instead of looking at what happened last month (traditional style) and saying “Well, I’ll try to do better next time. I shouldn’t have spent that much money on…”, you can get ahead of that overspending BEFORE it happens. Traditional budgeting is like trying to drive your car forward while only looking in the rear view mirror.
There are lots of budgeting apps and sites available to help people with their cash flow planning, but not all of them work the same way. The key is finding one that you’re comfortable with and that you’re willing to stick with. There is a learning curve with any new process or tool.
Two of my favorite budgeting tools are YNAB (You Need A Budget) and EveryDollar (Dave Ramsey’s budgeting tool). Both offer subscription-based plans and both work off a zero-based budgeting principle.
I recently heard a great analogy from Jesse Machum (founder of YNAB). He was asked what made his tool (and zero-based budgeting approach) different than most of the other backward-looking tools on the market (Mint.com, Personal Capital, etc.). He drew the comparison to the Tom Cruise movie Minority Report and a CSI crime show.
Zero-Based Budgeting – it’s like Minority Report… with the precogs, they ANTICIPATED upcoming crimes and put people in jail BEFORE the crime was committed. Their job was PREVENTION.
Traditional Budgeting – it’s like CSI… they came on scene AFTER there was a dead body. Their job was figuring out what ALREADY HAPPENED to the person in an effort to solve the crime.
Don’t get me wrong, any budget (even one that looks back at your historical spending) is better than NO budget, but at least in my experience (both personally and professionally) the zero-based budgeting approach is one that really works.
About the Author-
Brent Hoskins is a Kansas City-area fee-only financial planner. Focal Point Financial Group provides comprehensive financial planning and investment management to help individuals and families organize, grow and protect their assets through life’s transitions. As a fee-only, fiduciary, and independent financial advisor, Brent Hoskins is never paid a commission of any kind, and has a legal obligation to provide unbiased and trustworthy financial advice.
Focal Point Financial Group (“FPFG”), LLC is a Kansas-based registered investment advisor who provides advisory services in states where registered or otherwise exempt from registration. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. The presence of this website on the Internet shall not be directly or indirectly interpreted as a solicitation of investment advisory services to persons of another jurisdiction unless otherwise permitted by statute. Follow-up or individualized responses to consumers in a particular state by FPFG in the rendering of personalized investment advice for compensation shall not be made without our first complying with jurisdiction requirements or pursuant an applicable state exemption.
All written content on this site is for information purposes only. Opinions expressed herein are solely those of FPFG, unless otherwise specifically cited. Material presented is believed to be from reliable sources and no representations are made by our firm as to other parties’ informational accuracy or completeness. All information or ideas provided should be discussed in detail with an advisor, accountant or legal counsel prior to implementation.